Tips on peer review with online scientific journals

Click Here to Submit Your Article

Scientific journals have heard their fair share of criticism, for instance, after scientist Dr. Hwang Woo Suk admitted in 20015 that his stem cell research used fabricated data. His research would impact the world of health by helping to cure various diseases including diabetes and Parkinson's disease. The damage was not just on Hwang, but also on the public perception of science itself. The prestigious U.S. journal, Science, which had published the research, got a fair share of criticism and negative attitude in the public eye: many wondered how the journal could have been so easily duped.

So as it is, not many people knew about peer research five years ago. Many people do nowadays. As a response to such issues, many international open access journals, online scientific journals and online open access journals have now put in place, a quality control process that includes peer review.

Peer review basically involves the scrutiny and critiquing of all new scientific discoveries, ideas and implications by expert scientists just before the work is accepted and published. That is not to mean peer is an idea adopted the other day. No. It has been around for about 300 years. One advantage of working with international open access journals, online scientific journals or online open access journals that emphasize on peer review strategies is that they are popularly trusted by many people, just for this reason. Many writers cite back their work and so popularity grows daily.

There is no doubt that Web 2.0 technologies are challenging peer review conventions, so it has appeared as if peer review is a recent idea. So we have witnessed more scientists posting raw experimental results, fledgling theories and draft papers recently like never before. However, peer review enabled collaboration.

As a publisher, you do not just wait to receive a rejection or acceptance of the paper. It allows important collaboration that improves research. Peer review international open access journals, online scientific journals, online open access journals or academic journals are the best when you want to attract more funding. These journals help improve a scientist’s visibility and are the best for you as a publisher because academic journals also like it since it improves their reputation also. Many people refer those academic journals that use peer-review system, as prestigious.

Peer review starts once journal editors have reviewed the manuscript for editorial and subject-matter issues. A team of reviewers, also known as referees, will basically read the paper closely and critique the work. It takes about two to four weeks, and depends on the company processes and number of staff. Some international open access journals, online scientific journals or online open access journals will do it within a week's time. These scientists will comment on validity, identify scientific errors, judge significance of findings, determine originality of the work, identify missing references and recommend if the work should be published or rejected.